Nuclear submarine madness
Today’s Age Article by Peter Hartcher confirms that the LNP and ALP want the nuclear submarines so that Australia (Zero nuclear weapons) can directly threaten China (350+ nuclear weapons). This …
Self-reliant self-defence for Australia
Today’s Age Article by Peter Hartcher confirms that the LNP and ALP want the nuclear submarines so that Australia (Zero nuclear weapons) can directly threaten China (350+ nuclear weapons). This …
What happens if a large adversary decides to blow up the proposed nuclear submarines (SSN) prior to launch but after the reactor is installed?
Australia could be far better defended by choosing weapons platforms better suited to the 21st century, and better suited to defending Australia at far lower cost. The threat to Australia …
It is reckless and damaging to Australia’s reputation and interests internationally for the Government to be again ramping up the rhetoric of war. Elana Mitchell, Democrats spokesperson for Foreign Affairs …
The government and the ALP continue to turn a blind eye to the military lessons from the Ukraine conflict.
Former leaders of our defence forces are today calling it out – climate change now represents the greatest threat to the future and security of Australians. Our earth is already …
With the price of unleaded petrol now over $2 per litre, the government is signaling a cut in fuel excise but this is no solution to higher prices or reducing …
What are the defence implications of the Ukraine invasion for Australia – especially in the next few years?
The Australian Navy is useless against China warn various experts in this Age investigation. Billions have been spent on surface warships that cannot survive modern warfare while the submarine program …
Australia should buy long-range anti-ship missiles instead of more tanks. Tanks are a bad way to defend Australia.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.